Dude, don't just randomly post links that you clearly HAVE NOT READ... That is not how citations work!
Originally Posted by
Smogard49
Now, what does increasing the pay for the weakest in society aim to do, well lets begin with the benefits for society at large; it seems to be a worldwide phenomena that the link between income inequality and crime is changing, however within the poorest part of society crime (often association with such) seems to occur way often than in the middle class and above. (1)
Is this even true though?
Let's look at the Stanford link:
Is the relationship between wealth and crime actually strong enough to rely on? Looking at the homicide vs income inequality graph, we can see it's pretty damn loose, what's more in USA it's pretty damn loose too. Do the statistics even show that more wealth = less crime? The graph is actually homicide vs income inequality - a large value of inequality shows a lot of disparity, not a lot of poor people, thus saying that the graph shows poor = more crime is incorrect, it actually shows more disparity = more crime.
Would raising the minimum wage actually give us all more money? If instead, as many predict, it will cause businesses to downsize then unemployment will increase along with crime as the stanford link shows.
Literally the first line of the worldbank link is "We investigate the robustness and causality of the link between income inequality and violent crime across countries"
Moving on, Levit S "The Changing Relationship between Income and Crime Victimization" - this article is about victimization, and actually concludes that poor people used to be unlikely victims of property orientated crime but are increasingly targeted, but the link between neighbourhood income and crime has WEAKENED (aka this is evidence counter to your assertion, this is why you should read your citations!!!) - "there is no relationship between median family income in the neighborhood and homicide rates in the 1990s."
Lastly you linked an article from Northwestern University, this article starts off interestingly: "The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that there is both a hereditary and an environmental component to the relation of social class and criminality. This analysis is possible because of the availability of data on a population of adoptees in Denmark. " (remembering from the earlier stanford article that Denmark has low income disparity and crime). I'm not going to discuss the article in depth but: "On the experiential side it is known that lower class status is connected to a variety of crime-associated characteristics such as less intellectual stimulation and lower educational attainment, greater disparity between opportunities and aspirations and greater likelihood of criminal associations. " So would decreasing income disparity between lower and middle class really help? No, it wouldn't.
Originally Posted by
Smogard49
That said, I believe rising minimum wage is not without a cost for society. The employment rate may be held at current levels, but entry level jobs for the young especially will most likely be harder to come by, and jobs for the weakest in society might be the cost of increasing the minimum wage, as such without proper legislation and a socialistic view (2) to begin with I believe the damage caused by increasing minimum wage can be devastating for the US economy.
I doubt employment rate could be held, I have no citation but I have read articles saying that businesses were planning to downsize in sanfran (?) if there was a minimum wage raise.