No. We don't consider things immoral because of hygiene.
It was a joke.
I explained why religious texts don't apply to homosexuality.
I don't care about religous texts, they matter not. What does matter is shit like
this exists. Doesn't matter, gay people in some cultures are still persecuted for it. So don't try and pretend it doesn't happen, it does.
Prejudices don't change whether or not something is immoral or not.
And? What is your point?
Which again asks my question (though I should add an addendum)
Is there anything intrinsically immoral about homosexuality?
No, not at all. As I said before, of course not.
Meh Ray what a boring reply, it seemed like you were going to disagree with me considering how many quotes you used, but all you did was agree...
ja obviously, that's what I said...
ja obviously, that's what I said...
You are asking me where in the bible it says to kill people for arbitrary reasons..?
Where is what term defined? I used like 18 words in that that sentence... More specific pl0xx.
.
-----
Why not? If 9/10 of society hates it do you think it will be passed? Even if it does get passed do you think society won't mock them?[/B]
In some cases, not all. You just can't say every gay person was born with those genetics. I do believe some were born that way, I'm not gonna lie.
I don't care about religous texts, they matter not. What does matter is shit like
this exists. Doesn't matter, gay people in some cultures are still persecuted for it. So don't try and pretend it doesn't happen, it does.
And? What is your point?
Thorn
http://www.smh.com.au/world/evolved-...510-1ydsj.html
Obama thinks it's cool, Christianity did not invent the concept of religion, the denial of gay rights is a denial of human rights and thus is oppressive.
Opinions go.
everyone via the first amendment
I support gay couples being together, but I don't support them calling it "marriage". I myself am not a christian, but I look at it from their P.O.V. if my religion said this can only happen between this and that, then why should it be able to happen between that and that with my support? So basically, they should stop this whole "rights" argument and settle with civil union.
Can't think of any off the top of him head; http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=bible+new+testament+kill
Hey, you don't get to pretend to be confused, you just quoted part of my post and said "where is this term defined? certainly not here". If you say such a nonsense phrase then you give up your right to be confused when people ask you what the heck you were talking about...
Thorn
Yeah, didn't really find any certain event.
I'm asking you to say what you mean by "divine confirmation bias." But anyways, Christians that tend to pick and choose certain dogmas are technically heretics.