Secret Santa 2024
Originally Posted by NearlyDead View Post
You are arguing about what should or shouldn't be.
I am not.


We can go ahead and run in circles all you want, but it's going to end up the same thing.
Abolishing words that "could be hurtful to x y z communities" isn't going to happen.
Your original question was answered anyway, so I don't really understand why you're
still arguing.


If I say anything more on it, then you'd start telling me how much I'm belittling the gays
again. so whatevs, later.

Your answer to the question was having to do with the history of racism, and thus it being more sensitive. I refute your reason, because it begs questions like "how much does a group have to suffer before they receive that treatment?" And that's a question you've yet to answer. That's a question you can't answer.
-----
Originally Posted by 1TheV View Post
Because calling someone a nigger\jew etc. is discriminative
Its hate ,and hate is a natural feeling of Human ,whatever generates it(Even if its bullshit)

But invade rectums are not natural, it causes AIDS(I know its not the only way to get aids)
Because rectum is used to get things out of it(if you catch my meaning) and not to let things enter
Btw genetic researches proove that no one born to be gay
Its an aberration , accept it
I'm also against hate towards gays, because we should help those people cure them out of this plague, brain disorder.

Where's your source on the genetic research?
Are you against straight couples who engage in anal sex?
What do you think of homosexual women, since you're so focused on the anal part, who may not engage in any type of anal play?
Last edited by Thellian; Jul 2, 2013 at 11:05 PM. Reason: <24 hour edit/bump
My signature sucks
Originally Posted by Thellian View Post
Are you against straight couples who engage in anal sex?
What do you think of homosexual women, since you're so focused on the anal part, who may not engage in any type of anal play?

Now you catched me with that.
Its ok if the couple is straight. But not so ok, its just another Extremism of the 21th century.Sex is got alot more important and with porn, extreme sex(those sick fetishes etc.) is borned
which is very weird.

Lesbians? I can't answer to this

But overall homosexuality is unacceptable both for women and men. But mostly for men.
I mean if a father and a son walking on the street and then the kid sees a gay couple kissing what the father will say when the son asks "what is this" ?
And thats where aberration begins
Because this kid would became gay, but originally he was straight.
See my mug , it'll probably turn the flowers black
Originally Posted by Thellian View Post
"how much does a group have to suffer before they receive that treatment?" And that's a question you've yet to answer. That's a question you can't answer.

I dunno maybe when there's a war over it. Perhaps when you are beating,
raping, pillaging, and killing these people that you do not like.


What is the significance of the holocaust? dunno man, can't answer that question.
wow that
sucked
Originally Posted by 1TheV View Post
I mean if a father and a son walking on the street and then the kid sees a gay couple kissing what the father will say when the son asks "what is this" ?
And thats where aberration begins
Because this kid would became gay, but originally he was straight.

i'm assuming you'd also start stuffing cacti in your rectum if you saw someone else doing it
-----
Originally Posted by 1TheV View Post
Btw genetic researches proove that no one born to be gay

source or you're retarded

Originally Posted by 1TheV View Post
I'm also against hate towards gays, because we should help those people cure them out of this plague, brain disorder.

i don't even know what to say regarding this
Last edited by pusga; Jul 3, 2013 at 12:08 AM.
oh yeah
Originally Posted by 1TheV View Post
Now you catched me with that.
Its ok if the couple is straight. But not so ok, its just another Extremism of the 21th century.Sex is got alot more important and with porn, extreme sex(those sick fetishes etc.) is borned
which is very weird.

Lesbians? I can't answer to this

But overall homosexuality is unacceptable both for women and men. But mostly for men.
I mean if a father and a son walking on the street and then the kid sees a gay couple kissing what the father will say when the son asks "what is this" ?
And thats where aberration begins
Because this kid would became gay, but originally he was straight.

Shame on you for not citing your sources for that utter drivel, if its just an opinion you should say as such.

Speaking for the gays, and i suppose other minorities by extension, why would you give these stupid shitty words power over you? this is not the dark ages. simply mock the lack of wit and thought that goes into them if it really offends you.
Originally Posted by Thellian View Post
But Azure, they are based on the same basic ignorance and bigotry. And I don't know how you don't take issue with double standards, especially when they are with regards to our moral compass. There is a disturbing break in our moral integrity if we're quick to snuff out racism but casually let homophobic remarks slide.

It's not just about homosexuality or race it's about what simply is. If your best friend called you right now and called you a homophobic slur you wouldn't so taking to him and be upset you'd probably have a good laugh. There's simply too many factors treat every situation the same.
Present to me the most beautiful woman, and I shall reward you with chronos
Originally Posted by Thellian View Post
Then why are words like faggot used as insults?

Why is 'cunt' used as an insult, and why is it also used as a term of endearment? Why are 'happy' and 'bundle of sticks' used to refer to homosexuals in the first place?

You are oversimplifying language way too much.
Originally Posted by pusga View Post


source or you're retarded



i don't even know what to say regarding this

I dont need sources(Btw I lost it, but I searched for it again and I found this http://sourcefednews.com/theres-no-g...ys-scientists/ )

I dont believe how everyone can be that ignorant
And if there would be no proof , it is still would be clear , that it is an aberration.
As you can see , in evolution most of the species have GENDERS
I repeat :Genders.You know, men and woman
Man can only have child if the couple is of one man and one woman.
Its just already a proof ,
thats why heterosexuality is natural but homo's are not

and bann me for hate speech i dont really care..
Last edited by 1TheV; Jul 3, 2013 at 11:32 AM.
See my mug , it'll probably turn the flowers black
Originally Posted by 1TheV View Post
I dont need sources(Btw I lost it, but I searched for it again and I found this http://sourcefednews.com/theres-no-g...ys-scientists/ )

i hope you understand how much you just contradicted yourself by linking that

according to the article that you just linked me, it's not genetic, it's epigenetic. AKA it still means that it's not based on choice. people are born like that, deal with it.
oh yeah