That's the UK or you. Just wait till next year, it'll be 4 year olds they're 'educating'

I mean I DO see how it could have some benefits. I know if I had learned about sex earlier and more properly my life might have been worlds easier a few times growing up. But I also went to a private school where we learned almost nothing outside of the lunch room from that one kid who "knew stuff".

If they found a way to keep it innocent, I think it could be acceptable at an early age, what age exactly I have no clue, especially since every person matures at a different speed. But I mean if it was like "O.k. when your parents met, they loved each other and made a baby." and maybe found some way of describing things that wasn't like "The PENIS goes in to the VAGINA, happy 6th birthday." and maybe even left out the mechanics of everything until the kids were older, but still at least mentioned it. Kids are growing up faster anyways.

Like personally I know my father is the type who will yell "Its the PARENTS job!!!" but I also know that all growing up we never had "the talk" I have no clue where he expected me to learn about things, but it ended up being the basics covered in 8th grade and hearsay until I was already out of highschool. And that was with a father who, in all other respects, was very involved in my life, I can only imagine how it is for the masses of kids born with parents who just sorta don't give a fuck.

but eh, 7 is pretty damn young, regardless.

Also, on a side note, I want a shirt that says "See?! The vagina is full of aids!!!"
I really think Jesusophile is a flaming homosexual man who likes to troll youtube. After watching more of his vids, he is totally gay, look at his hair, and well groomed face...it just makes sense.

You have to be a female to menstruate.

I disagree. Psychologically speaking people are developing at pretty much the same rate and have been for years.

It pisses me off when I see 8 yearolds in mini-skirts because their mother is a strumpet who got knocked up at 16 who doesn't know any better.

Forcing complex issues onto children with a poorly developed brain for decision making/understanding (Piagetian theory, Freudian theory etc) is terrible and people should stop fucking doing it on television, the radio and more and more in schools.

Although Freud is a proponent of sexual behaviours in four yearolds, I'm not sure his theories suggest that people should be educated at that age about various things in an explicit manner: it's non-essential information at that age and we should be discouraging it. Educators are at the mercy of society though, and if society wants to see 8 yearolds taking an 11 year-old dick we cant fucking do anything other than make people prepared so said 8 yearolds dont end up pregnant with a 15 yearold


Everything is fine here, then. I'm on my rag right now, actually.

I know what you mean. It always strikes me as disturbing to see parents who let their 9 year olds walk around looking like Miley Cirus or some shit. And while I give you that people might not be developing faster. I would still argue though that since many societies are set up like this, maybe it could be beneficial to educate people on it at an earlier age. How that could be done without causing more harm than good, I have no clue. But normally I stay away from slippery slope type thinking, and in this case I do think things have gotten progressively worse over the passed however many years. Literally 30 years ago you didn't have nearly as much of this stuff shoved in your kids face, kids had time to be kids. But now little girls are told they are only worth while if they are attractive from the time they are like 6 or some shit, maybe some sort of defense against that would be good...and even though the school is not the ideal place, trusting parents to do it stopped working a while ago I think for a vast portion of the population.

Also, lol, Im guessing strumpet is a European way of saying slut...god knows I have never heard that one before...it sounds British as hell though.