The bill does not infringe on any privacy
Maybe you misunderstood some part of the bill Gorman, that's a possibility you need to consider.
From my point of view it does nothing but infringe "normal people's"privacy.
Governments and Companies don't make "treaties" to protect citizens, they work for their own profit/interest at the risk of deminishing other people's liberties.
And they don't need to call their next bill "Sopa" to reach the same goal, since they've already passed Cispa : they can deliver another bill that would seem vague by itself, but would take all its proportions with the things that we (you) let pass with Cispa.
Hell that's so fucking obvious ! Thinking the government and companies dropped the "Sopa project" because they couldn't make it pass the first time is naïve as it can be. We lose our liberty bit by bit : if they can't make it pass in 1 big block, they'll make it pass in 2 or 3 parts to anaesthetise people. But the goal is the same : less privacy, more control, less freedom.
That's just the direction the world is taking, how is that hard to consider ?
http://rt.com/usa/anonymous-internet...nst-cispa-164/
Originally Posted by deprav
Maybe you misunderstood some part of the bill Gorman, that's a possibility you need to consider.
From my point of view it does nothing but infringe "normal people's"privacy.
Governments and Companies don't make "treaties" to protect citizens, they work for their own profit/interest at the risk of deminishing other people's liberties.
And they don't need to call their next bill "Sopa" to reach the same goal, since they've already passed Cispa : they can deliver another bill that would seem vague by itself, but would take all its proportions with the things that we (you) let pass with Cispa.
Hell that's so fucking obvious ! Thinking the government and companies dropped the "Sopa project" because they couldn't make it pass the first time is naïve as it can be. We lose our liberty bit by bit : if they can't make it pass in 1 big block, they'll make it pass in 2 or 3 parts to anaesthetise people. But the goal is the same : less privacy, more control, less freedom.
That's just the direction the world is taking, how is that hard to consider ?
http://rt.com/usa/anonymous-internet...nst-cispa-164/
Citation needed, please cite what part exactly infringes.
Originally Posted by darthigor
CISPA is only a way to warn the deep web users..
What.
CISPA sounds gay. The government doesn't need to know what the fuck I search and do. If they could spy on us what the fuck would happen to terrorist groups. They would abandon the internet and find a different way. There would be no possible way to track these fucking things. So what does that leave the government to do except spy on our personal lives . I would not want them enjoying a laugh over personal conversations and other things that they can see with cispa.
lurking
Originally Posted by Extreem
CISPA sounds gay. The government doesn't need to know what the fuck I search and do. If they could spy on us what the fuck would happen to terrorist groups. They would abandon the internet and find a different way. There would be no possible way to track these fucking things. So what does that leave the government to do except spy on our personal lives . I would not want them enjoying a laugh over personal conversations and other things that they can see with cispa.
Please read the bill before posting.
