HTOTM: FUSION
Keep in mind, failing to vote is not the same as voting to not lynch. I'll edit my above post, as I realize I worded it incorrectly.
All it takes is one bad day to reduce the sanest man alive to lunacy. That’'s how far the world is from where I am. Just one bad day.
"The proof is in the metaphorical pudding. Templar has admitted to being the inspector, and ysome came out to say he is the inspector to throw everyone off."
-----
Originally Posted by ysome View Post
We have a liar in our midst. I insist on not killing Risk because I investigated him the first night. He's just a villager.
If you don't believe me, lynch him. If he's mafia lynch me the next day and you win. If he's a villager you know I'm telling the truth.
Or just lynch Templar, and if he's the investigator lynch me the next day.

*Implying he is mafia
Last edited by dannyrug; Aug 2, 2014 at 07:39 PM. Reason: <24 hour edit/bump
A hasbeen like the rest
Originally Posted by dannyrug View Post

*Implying he is mafia

Originally Posted by ysome View Post
I was talking about lynching Risk not Templar.
I did say you could lynch either me or Templar. I didn't say it was a good idea.

Since everyone seems to be taking my one post so differently let me clarify.

I investigated RISK the first night. I found that RISK is not a mafia. If you don't believe me, lynch RISK. If RISK was a mafia, then you can lynch ME the next day phase. If RISK is not mafia then you would know I was right.
Originally Posted by Templar View Post
However, the way ysome is acting on risk's behalf seems strange to me, so if any of ya'll want to lynch ysome, I'll change my vote.

I just don't want the first person I investigated and wasted a whole night on to be killed anyways.
It's a bit annoying you know?

I thought I already posted my change of vote, but apparently not, I want to abstain.
Last edited by ysome; Aug 2, 2014 at 08:55 PM.
"In my opinion, the existence of life is a highly overrated phenomenon." -Jon Osterman
Temp is saying he's investigator and wants to lynch Risk, so I assume he 'knows' that Risk is Mafia. Ysome says he isn't. I vote to Lynch Risk. This is confusing.. :/
Updated tally:

Risk: 3 (dannyrug, Templar, Erif)
No Lynch: 2 (Wight, ysome)

Yet to vote: 3 (toolfree, DartzPie, Risk)
All it takes is one bad day to reduce the sanest man alive to lunacy. That’'s how far the world is from where I am. Just one bad day.
Originally Posted by Erif View Post
Temp is saying he's investigator and wants to lynch Risk, so I assume he 'knows' that Risk is Mafia. Ysome says he isn't. I vote to Lynch Risk. This is confusing.. :/

I do not know if risk is mafia. I do however, know that the person I investigated is not mafia. And that was not risk. Ysome claims he is the investigator, which I know is not true. None of you know if this is true. He is protecting Risk. Therefore, I wish to lynch risk, on account that it seems he and Ysome are working together. I may be wrong and risk may be innocent, but then why would ysome be protecting him? I feel that ysome is also mafia. Choose as you will.
FREE-SPEECH CAUSE FUCK YOU
ONLY COMMIES CHANGE AVVYS
Originally Posted by Erif View Post
Temp is saying he's investigator and wants to lynch Risk, so I assume he 'knows' that Risk is Mafia. Ysome says he isn't. I vote to Lynch Risk. This is confusing.. :/

Originally Posted by Templar View Post
I do not know if risk is mafia.

Personal bias and incomplete information leads to poor decision-making. Change your vote to abstain, and we can wait for confirmation from one of the "investigators".

At this point, there's enough circumstantial "evidence" to implicate anyone as mafia. There are lurkers, people voting together on lynching one person, and a false investigator. Random lynching isn't the ideal strategy here.
"We are not here for strategy. I am using the proper amount of meta-gaming to know who the mafioso are." "I also do know who the inspector is, and it is not ysome, giving almost concrete evidence that ysome and Risk are the mafioso."
A hasbeen like the rest
No strategy = town loses. Nothing is certain at this point. You can't possibly know as a fact the identity of the inspector unless you've specifically broken the rule.

Originally Posted by hawkesnightmare View Post
It should go without saying that showing a screenshot of your role PM, or any other PM to or from anyone participating to prove or disprove one's innocence is against the rules, and you will be disqualified if caught.