Originally Posted by
Pimp
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releas...-cgr103113.php
Teacher directed me to this link and also said in psychology there is no such thing as bisexuality it doesn't hold up apparently but in the medical feild they may recognize it as a thing
honestly idek
As we established on IRC, your teacher is, most definitely, talking shit. It's kind of boggling how dumb your teacher is if he linked you that as evidence that bisexuality doesn't 'hold up'. All the link talks about are the results of a study that found that straight men are 3x more likely (than gay men) to disagree that bisexuality is a sexual orientation. That has
nothing to do with whether or not bisexuality is actually a legitimate sexual orientation. The link holds no relevance or weight at all in proving his/your argument. I'm doubting this teacher is even telling you + linking you to these things, because he must be mind-bogglingly incompetent if he is.
Originally Posted by
Pimp
I used the wrong word there he tells me that sexual identity is what you all are thinking about your sexual identity is homo hetero asexual bisexual and many others
But orientation is the key word you can't not be oriented to one or the other (homo and hetero) being those options
Sexuality is not a coin, with heterosexuality on one side and homosexuality on the other. It's a continuum. The following is a quote from the APA (American Psychological Association) - basically the gold standard reference for these types of issues. Take note of the inclusion of bisexuality as a sexual orientation.
Originally Posted by APA
Research over several decades has demonstrated that sexual orientation ranges along a continuum, from exclusive attraction to the other sex to exclusive attraction to the same sex. However, sexual orientation is usually discussed in terms of three categories: heterosexual (having emotional, romantic, or sexual attractions to members of the other sex), gay/lesbian (having emotional, romantic, or sexual attractions to members of one’s own sex), and bisexual (having emotional, romantic, or sexual attractions to both men and women).
There's more to the paper and if you want to learn more you can read it
here. More recently, asexuality has also become considered to be a legitimate sexual orientation. If you're going to continue arguing that bisexuality isn't a legitimate sexual orientation, then you're going up against a tide of evidence and the accepted status quo.
Sorry if this post came across as disdainful in any way (this wasn't my intent), but it's just such a ridiculous position to hold and it takes almost no time to do a little bit of research to debunk it, so I would've thought someone like you would've done that by now.
Last edited by Ele; Feb 26, 2016 at 04:15 AM.