Originally Posted by
kumi
Current gen of games can use 4gb of RAM, but your OS and other programs will use some too. And besides that there is going to be another gen of games coming soon enough! And ignoring that, use a RAMDisk application to make superfast harddrives, sure 3 or 4 times faster is nice, but 100 times faster is better! (Not exaggeration, as I said the fastest SSDs will run at 100-500mb/s where as RAM runs at 5000-10000mb/s)
With a 256gb SSD you can fit quite a few games on there, but compare the price to a 64gb or such. With a 64gb you can easily fit a handful of games on there - with over 400 games on Steam I did a quick check, and the average size of a game is just over 10gb, so unless you play 20+ games regularly I wouldn't say it is justified for the cost. Also consider how many games you actually play regularly and would benefit from a speed boost. Games that require constant loading (think of big RPGs and MMOs where they need to load many different parts of the game at different times), as compared to a game where all loading is done at the start and quite rarely afterwards (especially RTS, FPS etc, where you load on startup and then when you join a new map - most of the load time in such games is communication with servers not HDD).
Well if you judge ascetics on the amount of glowy lights then I guess Razer is the one for you :P But just know their quality won't compare to others :3
Actually Ducky has some glowy boards and they are high quality, so maybe check them out. They look a lot more slick then Razer, less chunky.
SSD>Ramdisk, for one size matters, when you're talking about limited space on an SSD. as it is a ramdisk will at most utilize 75% of your available memory(not smart honestly) even if it is faster. a WD caviar black is decent enough for gaming, the SSD lume chose would be a lot better than that. sure if you have $300 to spend on ram to be able to effectively have enough room to store a game like battlefield 3 on a ramdisk you might want to think about it but for price to space an SSD is WAY more effective than ramdisk. (seriously not sure if you thought about the cost)
aside from that, i personally own and have installed on my computer over 30 games that i do play occasionally, more than enough times to not want to reinstall them when i play them. it's just more convenient to have them installed for when you do want to play them.
as for the keyboard issue (lol considering it seems you didn't read what lume said previously) "While I'm not looking for flashy lights I want my products, if i'm paying upwards of $100, to look nice as well. " show's he clearly doesn't judge aesthetics by flashy lights.
MY only change would be instead of the i7 2600k swap it out for an i5 2500k or 2550k because for gaming you wont notice much if anything between an i7 2600 and an i5 2500.
just one more thing i think is funny "(even if an SSD typically runs at 100-500mb/s, RAM runs at 5000-10000mb/s easily)." later you say " use a RAMDisk application to make superfast harddrives, sure 3 or 4 times faster is nice, but 100 times faster is better! (Not exaggeration, as I said the fastest SSDs will run at 100-500mb/s where as RAM runs at 5000-10000mb/s)" while theoretically a ramdisk CAN run as fast as your ram is able to run generally they aren't that efficient as you still have to calculate read/write times into the ram. ram doesn't "run" at 5000 to 10000mb/s that's generally it's read time. the write times for ram are generally worse. in my test of using a ramdisk the performance was around 2000mb/s utilizing hdtune to benchmark. while faster it's not worth the cost over an ssd. while useful for firefox or chrome or some small applications it's nowhere near practical to use when running games or ram extensive applications like photoshop.
Last edited by Organ; May 10, 2012 at 12:25 PM.