Originally Posted by
Hamster
Which means it's clearly the divine judgment of God for punishing gays, right?
Your statements are untrue, I found a scanning electron microscope image of HIV particles after a couple seconds of searching Google.
http://www.avert.org/aids-picture.php?photo_id=503
http://www.primitivism.com/hiv-interview.htm
CJ: Didn't Luc Montagnier and Robert Gallo isolate HIV back in the early eighties?
EPE: No. In the papers published in Science by those two research groups, there is no proof of the isolation of a retrovirus from AIDS patients [1, 2].
CJ: They say they did isolate a virus.
EPE: Our interpretation of the data differs [3-5]. To prove the existence of a virus you need to do three things. First, culture cells and find a particle you think might be a virus. Obviously, at the very least, that particle should look like a virus. Second, you have to devise a method to get that particle on its own so you can take it to pieces and analyze precisely what makes it up. Then you need to prove the particle can make faithful copies of itself. In other words, that it can replicate.
CJ: Can't you just look down a microscope and say there's a virus in the cultures?
EPE: No, you can't. Not all particles that look like viruses are viruses.
there are enough scientists who have their doubts, just google it
Originally Posted by
Hamster
Which means it's clearly the divine judgment of God for punishing gays, right?
blacks, actually
Last edited by GHB; Jul 22, 2010 at 09:23 PM.