Eridanus Supervoid
First off, I'd like to say, don't post if you have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about.
Second, there have been many guesses as to what the Eridanus Supervoid is, but none have been provable with math. The significance of this supervoid, the biggest in the entire
discovered universe, has completely been undetermined. There is a 1.85% chance that it was created by Quantum fluctuations, according to WMAP and their Gaussian simulations.
One possible explanation of the cold spot is a huge void between us and the primordial CMB. Voids can produce a cooler region than surrounding sightlines from the late-time integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect.[8] This effect would be much smaller if dark energy weren't stretching the void as photons went through it.
Rudnick et al.[9] found a dip in NVSS galaxy number counts in the direction of the Cold Spot, suggesting the presence of a supervoid. Since then, some additional works have cast doubt on the supervoid explanation. The correlation between the NVSS dip and the Cold Spot was found to be marginal using a more conservative statistical analysis.[10] Also, a direct survey for galaxies in several one-degree-square fields within the Cold Spot found no evidence for a supervoid.[11] However, the supervoid explanation has not been ruled out entirely; it remains intriguing, since supervoids do seem capable of affecting the CMB measurably.[7][12]
Although large voids are known in the universe, a void would have to be exceptionally vast to explain the cold spot, perhaps 1000 times larger in volume than expected typical voids. It would be 6 billion–10 billion light-years away and nearly one billion light-years across, and would be perhaps even more improbable to occur in the large scale structure than the WMAP cold spot would be in the primordial CMB.
That is one of the possible explanations for it, but its ridiculously low temperature sticks out like a sore thumb, even in the pseudo-vacuum of space.
Another, more controversial explanation is this:
A controversial claim by Laura Mersini-Houghton is that it could be the imprint of another universe beyond our own, caused by quantum entanglement between universes before they were separated by cosmic inflation.[14] Laura Mersini-Houghton said, "Standard cosmology cannot explain such a giant cosmic hole" and made the remarkable hypothesis that the WMAP cold spot is "… the unmistakable imprint of another universe beyond the edge of our own." If true this provides the first empirical evidence for a parallel universe (though theoretical models of parallel universes existed previously). It would also support string theory. The team claims there are testable consequences for its theory. If the parallel universe theory is true there will be a similar void in the opposite hemisphere of the Celestial sphere[15][16] (which New Scientist reported to be the Southern hemisphere; the results of the New Mexico array study reported it as Northern hemisphere[17]). A sophisticated method of data analysis - Kolmogorov complexity - has derived evidence for a north and a south cold spot in the satellite data:[18] "...among the high randomness regions is the southern non-Gaussian anomaly, the Cold Spot, with a stratification expected for the voids. Existence of its counterpart, a Northern Cold Spot with almost identical randomness properties among other low-temperature regions is revealed." That these predictions and others were made prior to the measurements see Laura Mersini. However, apart from the Southern Cold Spot, the varied statistical methods in general fail to confirm each other regarding a Northern Cold Spot.[19] The 'K-map' used to detect the Northern Cold Spot was noted to have twice the measure of randomness measured in the standard model - the reason is speculated to be the randomness introduced by voids (unaccounted-for voids were speculated to be the reason for the increased randomness above the standard model).[20]
Since these are the 2 main theories about its existence currently, I won't post the any other ones atm. Anyone want to offer any insight on what they think is correct, and why?