Secret Santa 2024
Original Post
[Art]Evil Signatures
So I've gotten back to the forum and seen a few signature artist are also back on. With that being Said I've started making signatures again. I'm still rusty so take it easy, but besides that enjoy and don't forget to Cnc. Made with Photoshop. I'll see if I can find original renders on my pc later


Toribash Senior |Wushu Master| YouTube Dancer |Video Editor| Senior Gfx artist| Univ of Penn Alumni|#Ivyleague
it's better without text, the text sucks.

the first sig is a bit dirty, too many things.

second one is better, but the back ground sucks-_-

keep it up. i like it, over all 8/10 on the second one, and 7/10 for the first sig.
Seniman Elektronik Indonesia | GATA
Got any questions ? Throw me a PM or just mention @toriabiz on Twitter
Second one is a big improvement, I give you praise for using cleaner simpler text, and colour balancing a lot better (using softer sat/cont and blur background), abstract has good flow and well blended in to the render.

I wonder how you improved so much, considering the conventional style I would say tutorial?
Okay so;
(1)There is nothing good about this. There is no depth, flow, or a sense of lighting. The text is ugly, you threw on some random light-wireframe w/o thinking of a sense of flow or lighting, and the color is just conflicting and ugly.

(2)This one looks better (even though I think you mimic'd how I had made one my signatures, which is okay).
The flow is good, the render is cool, the depth is... satisfactory, text is horrible. Don't add text that will make everything conflict between each other.

(1) 1/10
(2) 7/10

Now, I just want to know; when you said
Originally Posted by EvilStealthWarrior View Post
So I've gotten back to the forum and seen a few signature artist are also back on.

Were you referring to me and used my signature as a reference? (Hence the border, and the overall style of the signature)
I bought a subscription to Wibbles so I think this quote is necessary,
"Be careful when gazing into the void, for it gazes back"
I don't mind the yellow text on the second one, the analogous though separated colour makes it stand out well, and fits the overall image. Using only colours from essentially 1/3rd of the colour wheel keeps it analogous and ties it together. Nice synergy (probably incidental) with the yellow on the render and the text.

He could have worked better to use spot colours, but all in all even if it is incidental, it is a good choice.


Also, I googled "gfx signature" and I got about a million results in the similar style to yours and his, so I don't think he copied...
Omg Ty for the Cnc guys .This what I like to see in a forum . Yeah I've gotten my better fonts now. Before I was just working and playing around with the few I had.

lilmali: Actually I didn't copy from you.(probably would have been a good idea :3)
Yeah the first Signature was just me playing around.I believe I was attempting to try an Red mist style.The 2nd one is more like the quality and style I'm use to doing. I hate when I get too curious and go to far.I really do like your style though.

ty toribiaz yeah , the text is a indeed a fixer upper.

Immortalcow: You seemed to be the best at figuring out what I was trying to do. I think I'm chill from using text until I get my stuff together.♥ ty for your tc.

Update: Wip -This one I'm trying to stay simple. Cnc plz
Toribash Senior |Wushu Master| YouTube Dancer |Video Editor| Senior Gfx artist| Univ of Penn Alumni|#Ivyleague
Not going to bother with the first one. I believe you know what you've done wrong there.

Second one is pretty nice. I think the borders could go, they're a bit distracting. The text distracts from the focal too much. Nice flow, could use some work on depth. Lighting seems off. It would probably benefit from being cropped. Too much empty space on the left side.

Third is okay. It looks like it would have made a much better vertical tag. Sides are boring. Could use some work on flow/depth.