Now i am not sure were to put this thread because its going to be a debate/poll type of idea, But we will see. If this thread is not within correct placement, Please direct me to the correct one.

--topic--
Now i have heard of a lot of people (including me neighbors) yelling about which game is the best, To be honest i do not think you can compare them, Yes they are both FPS's And both are extremely fun and addicting, But i believe battlefields "Open and vehicles" type of gameplay cannot compare to call of duties "Shoot em all, CQC". Its like comparing an apple to an orange, Yes they are fruits, but not of the same thing,

Thoughts?

Call of Duty is more fast paced to me, better 1st person shooting, but Battlefield 3 has way more options in weaponry. I loved it, I would prefer Btf3 over CoD anyday.

Battlefield wins by a longshot, this is not even a personal preference thing. There is way more customization in battlefield, more realistic, and gameplay is ten times better.

BattleField 3 would own COD's BUTT

We don't need a garbage thread like this. CoD and Battlefield are both pretty lame. CoD is for fast-paced hyper 10-year-old boys, and battlefield is for people who really wish they were in the military.

Try Medal of Honor. Or any other fps of the dozens of fps' better than the afformentioned games.


(Battlefield is definitely better than CoD, though. But it's the best of a bad situation.)

Read the rules, no X vs Y threads.
I do not want this shit.

Closed.