Originally Posted by
ImmortalPig
Yeah, a /very/ convenient choice.
Though perhaps the choosing of the temple mount as the site of solomon's temple was itself merely for convenience, after all, there is no evidence that it was actually there.
There is no strong evidence that Solomon's Temple ever existed in the first place. I'm simply informing you that Temple Mount is where it is believed to have been.
That's not entirely a matter of convenience, either. Solomon's Temple, according to the Torah, was built in ancient Jerusalem, which pretty clearly coincides with the modern Jerusalem.
This goes back to why Jews migrated to Israel, even before the Holocaust. It's laughable to say that Israel was a convenient choice of living situation. No, it's because it was viewed as the promised land, home of sites such as the foundation stone, the old city, etc.