Original Post
Name change addition
The plan!
All right, so we all know that name changing currently, the minimum is around 3 years of inactivity before you can pay 100k and take that name you always wanted just for a laugh and to feel amazing, right? Well, I've noticed that a few usernames have been taken but never used! I know, a sin in it's self, no Qi, no posts, nothing, just a username and a password. I suggest that you make it plausible to snatch up those unused accounts names after 1 year, for 100k tc, or maybe even a cheaper price at 75k-50k considering they weren't used at all.
The Pros
The pro's of this would be ones such as "people can choose unused names they previously weren't able to get for a cheap price and quickly!" which would possibly please people who want specific names at a cheaper price because they were completely unused :P.
All right, so we all know that name changing currently, the minimum is around 3 years of inactivity before you can pay 100k and take that name you always wanted just for a laugh and to feel amazing, right? Well, I've noticed that a few usernames have been taken but never used! I know, a sin in it's self, no Qi, no posts, nothing, just a username and a password. I suggest that you make it plausible to snatch up those unused accounts names after 1 year, for 100k tc, or maybe even a cheaper price at 75k-50k considering they weren't used at all.
The Pros
The pro's of this would be ones such as "people can choose unused names they previously weren't able to get for a cheap price and quickly!" which would possibly please people who want specific names at a cheaper price because they were completely unused :P.
Le Cons
You're probably wandering what problems, if any, this totally amazing idea could cause. There's a couple extremely obvious ones, which I hope you already considered, such as "What if the guy who previously owned the account comes back?" and "Wont this create an influx in name changes?" But never fear, the answer to these is quite simple.
Around 49/50 times, these accounts with no activity except creation will be forgotten, since they haven't been used in at least a year, and if they aren't forgotten by the original creator, they'll simply have had a forgotten password. Plus, the creator of these accounts is unlikely to come back to them if he's left them for a year, in the cold depths of loneliness with absolutely nothing and no usage. It should be fine just to take the account name, as even if they do come back, remember the name and password, and log in to play, they'll have had no qi, so it would have been exactly like a new account, just it was already created. That leaves the other problem of the influx in name changes, which is easy to tackle; people like to remain known and like people to know it's them, so name changing is already less desirable, but the majority of good names have had at least some activity, so it'd still cost 100k for them. There are a minimum amount of names possible to take that are good names or popular ones., I can't think of any.
The summary
I request the ability to take names that have been in-active for a year and have no qi, no posts, no transaction history, nothing, for a possibly cheaper price with a bare minimum of 50k to allow people to have those names they always wanted but were created but not used from a year ago onwards.
Around 49/50 times, these accounts with no activity except creation will be forgotten, since they haven't been used in at least a year, and if they aren't forgotten by the original creator, they'll simply have had a forgotten password. Plus, the creator of these accounts is unlikely to come back to them if he's left them for a year, in the cold depths of loneliness with absolutely nothing and no usage. It should be fine just to take the account name, as even if they do come back, remember the name and password, and log in to play, they'll have had no qi, so it would have been exactly like a new account, just it was already created. That leaves the other problem of the influx in name changes, which is easy to tackle; people like to remain known and like people to know it's them, so name changing is already less desirable, but the majority of good names have had at least some activity, so it'd still cost 100k for them. There are a minimum amount of names possible to take that are good names or popular ones., I can't think of any.
The summary
I request the ability to take names that have been in-active for a year and have no qi, no posts, no transaction history, nothing, for a possibly cheaper price with a bare minimum of 50k to allow people to have those names they always wanted but were created but not used from a year ago onwards.
Have a nice day~~~
Love from Ze <3
Tim is bae :3
I love this idea, I've saw many ppl with names but they don't have qi etc.
this should be implemented
Supported
this should be implemented
Supported
Weirdest Tori in Toribash
<Diuwaybuns> Toribash is unprotected sex
<Diuwaybuns> Toribash is unprotected sex
This is a good idea but I believe the price should be the same for the namechange since its the namechange your paying for and not the name
Actually I agree with Tree, since you're taking away someone's chance of getting into the game with a specific name after 1 year it should cost more
