This message has been deleted

That doesn't explain why we should get rid of it.

This message has been deleted

Sorry, I was almost certain that how much time you put in this game has a factor in how good you are.

Beating 1000s of new players makes you better than 1000s of people. Period.

This message has been deleted

There's no point in talking to you about this, all I'm getting is ad hominems.

I'll just wait for someone to get rank 1 with 100% win rate because all it takes is time, not anything like, you know.. knowing how to move in this game which apparently no one can do.
Can't even think of a game where everyone earns their rank, and plays against people who also earned their rank based on how good they are accurately.

This message has been deleted

Rather than removing why not rant about everything that's broken in it - as in stuff that needs fixed without replacing it.

Ideally with ways it should work (eg tiered matchmaking so beginners can't become victims) or things of the such.

Obviously it needs fixed, but it kinda needs people to kick up more of a fuss about it to get the dev attention.

Sure, it's a factor. But correlation isn't 100%, and even if it was that means we find a way to measure one or the other. It most certainly does not mean we intentionally conflate the two.

So, what? All I've got is to allow people to play the same time 1/3/5 times (like a set) before finding a new player